napkin.
Menu

CALCULATORS / BEAMS, PLATES AND STRUCTURAL SCREENING

Assembly compliance budget calculator

Conservative sum of aligned compliance contributions.

structures-deflection-budget.napkin / editable
✓ checks pass

SCENARIO COMPARISON

Compare the numbers.

This source describes an analytical model. Its quantities and checks are the view.

Scenariototalmmremainingmm
0.80.2
0.70.3

All calculated quantities are listed with the inputs. Switch to Source to inspect the equations.

SCENARIOS / CALCULATED VALUESSAME SOURCE

Change an input to see the consequences.

deflection budget0.80 mm✓ passes

BASELINE INPUTS

CALCULATED

total0.8 mm
remaining0.2 mm

Edits change the baseline source.

Calculated from your source · not saved
Baseline · Baseline
deflection budget0.80 mm ✓ passes
alternative · alternative
deflection budget0.70 mm ✓ passes

Illustrative first-order example. Checks are editable requirements, not design standards. The broader topic may require additional equations, data, and validation.

Formula and units

This example uses the following equations. Input names and units match the editable source above.

total
total = beam+joint+bearing [mm]
remaining
remaining = limit-total [mm]

Original worked example

These are the baseline values in the downloadable source. Edits above let you test your own values.

Given

beam
0.5 mm
joint
0.2 mm
bearing
0.1 mm
limit
1 mm

Calculated

total
0.8 mm
remaining
0.2 mm

Assumptions and limits

Conservative sum of aligned compliance contributions.

The requirement checks use the limits written in this example. Passing a check does not establish that the model covers every load, material behavior, or operating condition in a real design.

Download this .napkin example ↓

Take it further with your agent

Napkin keeps the inputs, equations, checks and assumptions together in one study. Your agent sets it up; you change the numbers.

Try with Claude ↗

codex 'Use Napkin (https://napkin.engineering/mcp, or the local Napkin plugin) to build a study: Assembly compliance budget. Inputs: component stiffnesses; load path; applied load. Outputs: combined deflection; dominant compliance. Model scope: Linear elastic idealizations and stated boundary conditions. Read napkin_capabilities and the current snapshot. Ask me for the values that matter, label assumptions with units, author .napkin source, validate it and apply it with napkin_source using the current revision, then open the study. Add checks for the limits I supply. Keep unsupported analyses explicit.'

Claude needs the Napkin connector; Codex needs the Napkin plugin. Set up your agent ↗

The broader study

The topic brief below describes the broader scope. The worked example above states the particular calculation it implements.

  • Inputs: component stiffnesses, load path, applied load
  • Outputs: combined deflection, dominant compliance
  • Modes: calculate, compare, sweep
  • Drawing: Deflection and stress diagram

EXECUTABLE WORKED EXAMPLE · FIRST-ORDER MODEL · CHECK THE SCOPE & ASSUMPTIONS

More in beams, plates and structural screening